The Middle East Crisis Through
The Eyes Of The Rebbe
Translated by Zushe Kohn
In the wars that Israel has
fought in recent years, three grave mistakes were made, all of them the results
of placing political considerations above security considerations:
1) The most difficult battle of
the Six Day War was the one fought over Yerushalayim’s Old City. Hundreds of
Israeli soldiers were killed. Why? Because, for political reasons (such as,
"what will the Vatican say?" etc.), a resolution to conquer
Yerushalayim’s Old City was not made. As a result, security officials did not
prepare an attack on Yerushalayim, and hundreds of Jews were killed and wounded.
2) Today everyone admits that
prior to the outbreak of the Yom Kippur War, clear information was received
concerning the impending attack from Egypt. Security officials calculated that a
fully deployed Tzahal could abort the attack, thereby lessening the
number of ‘sacrifices.’ Moreover, when the enemy would hear about the ‘full
deployment,’ this alone could deter them from war. Such was the opinion of the
military experts. But the politicians thought otherwise: "It doesn’t pay
to anger the United States...!" This consideration brought devastating
consequences, thousands upon thousands of sacrifices, may G-d avenge their
blood, as well as many wounded, many of whom have remained maimed until this
very day!
3) The very same mistake was
repeated in the Lebanese War (Sh‘lom HaGalil): Military experts demonstrated
how a surprise attack against Lebanon would bring unusual success and a swift
conclusion to the operation. But the moment the army went to war, the
politicians began to clamor, and day by day they hindered the armies activities
until the matter became problematic. As a result, sacrifices have been falling (r’l)
for weeks and months now! Why don’t they learn from the past...?!"
(See public addresses of Kislev
1976 and Kislev 19, 1983.)
When The Enemy Is Given
Concessions They Immediately Ask For More
There are those who argue:
"We must make concessions, for we need the chesed le’umim
[international beneficence], the money and weapons which the United
States gives us. It doesn’t pay to anger them; we have to give in to their
demands..." The response to this is that if Israel makes concessions then,
Heaven forefend, there will be nothing left for which to utilize the money and
weapons they’ll receive. As we see already now, when the enemy is given
concessions they immediately ask for more. In fact, they have already stated
that before the agreement is actually signed they will ask for more! And so it
will continue until they ask for Yerushalayim’s Old City...!
Only if they stand strong will
there be money and weapons. As we have seen up until this point, those issues on
which they stood firm, did not hinder the transfer of money and weapons.
(Perhaps they caused a temporary disturbance, but nothing in the long range.)
(See public address of 19 Kislev,
1978)
When It Comes To Human Life, The
Issue Is No Longer One Of Democracy
Even in a democracy, such as
New York for example, if someone would climb the Brooklyn Bridge and threaten to
jump into the river, the police and firefighters would immediately be summoned
to prevent the person from jumping at all costs. But wait! What about democracy?
This individual, one could argue, is his own master, and no one has the right to
tell him what to do with his own life! The fact is, though, that when it comes
to human life, the issue is no longer one of democracy; rather, everything
possible is done to save the person. Now if this is true concerning one
human-being, how much more so is it true when the lives of millions of Jews are
at stake! No one — not even they themselves — has the right to endanger
their lives!
(See public address of Cheshvan,
1985.)
This Approach, However, Runs
Contrary To The Nature Of The United States.
The solution to the political
situation in Eretz Yisroel is the very opposite of the approach taken by the
Israeli governments up until now. Their approach has been that the more
concessions they will make on matters of vital interest, the more they will
gain. This approach, however, runs contrary to the nature of the United States.
The United States arose and was founded through firm adherence to the principle
that on matters of vital interest concessions cannot be made. They maintained
this stance despite opposition from England, France, and essentially the entire
world.
(Talk with Mr. Elyakim
Rubinshtein, Cheshvan 1989.)
Giving Away Land: A Matter Of
Life And Death
When Mr. Moshe Katzav (now
president of Israel) approached the Rebbe, the Rebbe shook hands with him and
continued to hold his hand throughout the entire (18 minute) conversation. The
Rebbe blessed him that in the course of his public duties he should merit to
gather together the People of Israel, the Torah of Israel, and the Holy One
blessed be He in such a manner that the three would never become separated.
Then the Rebbe said:
I recently heard a bizarre and
shocking rumor — that the Israeli government is discussing and planning to
give away portions of the Land of Israel. The discussions are currently focused
on a five-year plan called ‘autonomy.’ In truth, however, it doesn’t
matter what government officials are calling it, because the fact is that these
discussions and plans fall under the explicit Torah prohibition of "Lo
Sechaneim," i.e., the prohibition against giving any part of
Israel to non-Jews. These discussions will, in fact, result in the
eventual giveaway of parts of Israel, and as such, represent a denial of G-d,
His Torah, the Land of Israel and the holiness of the Land.
These autonomy talks are the
first step to the giving away of parts of Israel — not only small parts, but
large parts, as well, such as Judah, Samaria, Gaza, Chevron, Yerushalayim, etc.
This is very literally a matter of life and death! As I said, the manner in
which Jews like to think of these talks, and the way in which they explain them
is irrelevant. What is relevant is that the gentiles view these talks as the
first step in an operation that will lead to the giving away of parts of Israel
and to the establishment of a Palestinian state.
You understand Arabic. Go ask
the Arabs living in Israel what they make of these talks. You will see; they
will tell you that their interpretation of the ‘five-year autonomy talks’ is
that they will be given parts of Israel for the purpose of establishing a
Palestinian state. Therefore, the way in which the Jews like to interpret these
talks is irrelevant. The essential factor is the manner in which the gentiles
are viewing it.
The mere discussions of the ‘autonomy
plan’ are in and of themselves a desecration of G-d and a desecration of
holiness. It is one thing that there are Jews living in Israel who in their own
personal lives do not observe Torah and mitzvos. It is quite another
matter, however, when the government of Israel declares open war against G-d and
His Torah.
(From Rebbe’s conversation with
Mr. Moshe Katzav, 10 Sh’vat, 1992)
(Click here
to continue.)
|